What to Look for in a Quality Assurance Provider: 8 Key Attributes for Project Success

by | Sep 23, 2024 | Quality Assurance

What to Look for in a Quality Assurance
When it comes to selecting a quality assurance provider for your project, the focus should not only be on technical expertise but also on the soft skills that truly make a difference. With years of experience in quality assurance, I’ve identified several key attributes that define an effective assurance provider, helping you navigate the complexities of your projects with confidence. Let’s explore the eight essential qualities your assurance provider should bring to the table.

1. Knowledge and Experience

Your assurance provider must possess a solid understanding of project processes, though they don’t need to be a domain expert. For instance, if you’re running an IT platform replacement, it’s not necessary for them to have specific experience in that field. However, they should have a good grasp of what an IT project entails. Most importantly, they need extensive assurance experience, with the ability to present findings clearly, engage with stakeholders effectively, and extract valuable information from your team.

What to Look for in a Quality Assurance

2. Empathy

A truly effective assurance provider walks the journey with you. They don’t just offer advice from the sidelines but work to understand the challenges your team faces. Empathy enables them to provide support that is both realistic and aligned with your team’s needs. While “be kind” may be a trendy phrase, genuine empathy is about understanding your team’s perspective and working in harmony with them, ensuring success without causing undue stress.

Empathy is also important to keep a project and team on track. Delivering information about improvements a project could benefit from is somewhat of an art form. Done too abruptly, and stakeholders or the project team could close off. Conversely, an empathetic communication style in the QA process can make feedback a supportive experience – not a judgemental one.

3. Active Listening

An underrated yet vital skill, listening allows an assurance provider to fully grasp the undercurrents within a project. It’s not just about hearing words but understanding the nuances behind them. Whether your team says everything is fine or that everything is broken, both statements often have deeper meanings. Your provider needs to dig beneath the surface to identify the true status of the project, enabling them to offer more tailored and meaningful guidance.

What to Look for in a Quality Assurance

4. Curiosity

The best assurance providers are inherently curious, constantly questioning what’s beneath the surface. They’re not content with superficial explanations; instead, they strive to explore and uncover potential risks or opportunities that may not be immediately visible. Curiosity leads them to probe deeper into the issues at hand, ensuring nothing is overlooked.

5. Adaptability and Humility

A good assurance provider understands that they don’t have all the answers, especially in unique or unfamiliar situations. They must be adaptable, drawing parallels from previous experiences but knowing when to step back and acknowledge that the situation may require a fresh approach. Humility also means recognising that you, the client, know your business better than they do, and that’s perfectly acceptable.

6. Perspective

When you’re in the thick of a project, it’s easy to lose sight of the bigger picture. An assurance provider’s role is to offer perspective. Sometimes, what feels like a project disaster is just a typical bump in the road, and sometimes it’s genuinely concerning. Either way, their perspective helps you understand whether you’re truly in trouble or just experiencing normal project challenges. They can offer reassurance when needed or point out when action must be taken to avoid further issues.

What to Look for in a Quality Assurance

7. A Touch of Pessimism

While an optimistic outlook is valuable, a healthy dose of pessimism is necessary in quality assurance. Your provider should take a ‘black hat’ approach at times, considering worst-case scenarios and assessing potential risks. This risk-focused mindset allows them to anticipate challenges and guide you in making informed decisions, even when the path ahead appears difficult.

8. Communication Skills

Finally, your assurance provider must be an excellent communicator. They need to be able to deliver difficult messages constructively, without causing unnecessary alarm or demoralising your team. Whether it’s suggesting a project reset or stopping a project entirely, they must frame their advice in a way that is actionable, helpful, and geared towards ensuring the success of your project. Good communication also helps maintain strong relationships with stakeholders and governance boards, ensuring everyone remains aligned and supportive.

What to Look for in a Quality Assurance

Navigating to Success: The Power of the Right Assurance Provider

A quality assurance provider with the right blend of knowledge, empathy, curiosity, and communication skills will be an invaluable asset to your project. These soft skills, more than technical expertise alone, are what enable them to guide your team towards successful outcomes, even in the face of challenges. By choosing a provider with these qualities, you set your project up for success, ensuring that you have the right support every step of the way.

Watch Nicki’s full video on what to look for in a QA provider

You may also like

The People Problem: Why Most New Zealand Project Failures Are Human at Heart

The People Problem: Why Most New Zealand Project Failures Are Human at Heart

When New Zealand projects fail, the postmortem almost always points to people. Not bad technology, not broken processes. People: interpersonal dynamics between sponsors and project managers, leadership continuity gaps, teams that never quite gel, and covert resistance from those who fear what the project means for their jobs. Drawing on years of reviewing programmes across the public and private sectors, our view at IQANZ is clear: the human element is both the greatest asset and the most underestimated risk in any programme.

Delivering in the Public Sector: What Makes New Zealand Government Projects So Hard to Get Right

Delivering in the Public Sector: What Makes New Zealand Government Projects So Hard to Get Right

New Zealand’s public sector operates under a set of structural constraints that private sector organisations simply do not face: three-year election cycles, financial year funding boundaries, acute political risk aversion, and the persistent challenge of saying no to people who outrank you. None of these are excuses for poor delivery. But understanding them is essential to doing anything useful about them. At IQANZ we work across both sectors, and here is our take on what makes public sector project delivery uniquely difficult, and what strong project leadership looks like in that environment.

AI in New Zealand Project Management: Genuinely Useful, Genuinely Risky, and Completely Unvetted by Experience

AI in New Zealand Project Management: Genuinely Useful, Genuinely Risky, and Completely Unvetted by Experience

AI tools are arriving in New Zealand’s project management landscape faster than most organisations know what to do with them. They offer real productivity benefits, particularly in document drafting and data aggregation, and the time savings on routine work are genuine. But at IQANZ our view is clear: AI output needs an experienced human lens applied to it, and the risk of AI being used to compensate for a lack of experience rather than to amplify genuine capability is already visible in practice. There is also a structural problem on the horizon that the profession has not yet grappled with seriously: if AI eliminates the junior roles through which project management expertise is built, the experience pipeline dries up, and the system eventually collapses when the last generation of truly experienced practitioners retires.